LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

American Perspectives. New York: Blackwell. pp. 71—91.

      Little, Richard (1996) ‘The Growing Relevance of Pluralism?’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zaiewski (eds). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.66-86.

      Little, Richard (2000) ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6 (3): 395-22.

      Long, David (1991) ‘J.A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 17 (3): 285-304.

      Long, David and Wilson, Peter (ed.) (1995) Thinkers of the Twenty Years' Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

      Maghroori, Ray (1982) ‘Introduction: Major Debates in

      International Relations’, in Ray Maghroori and Bennet, Ramberg (eds), Globalism Versus Realism: International Relations' Third Debate. Boulder: Westview. pp. 9-22.

      Mansbach, Richard, W. and Vasquez, John, A. (1981) In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

      Mearsheimer, John (1994/1995) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19:5-49.

      Mitchell, C.R. (1980) ’Analysing me "Great Debates": Teaching Methodology in a Decade of Change’, in R.C. Kent and G.P. Nielsson (eds), The Study and Teaching of International Relations. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 28-46.

      Morgenthau, Hans, J. (1946) Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

      Morgenthau, Hans, J. (1948) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

      Neal, Fred and Hamlett, Bruce D. (1969) ‘The Never-Never Land of International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 13 (2): 281-305.

      Neufeld, Mark A. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Nicholson, Michael (1996) Causes and Consequences in International Relations: A Conceptual Study. London: Pinter.

      Niebuhr, Reinhold (1940) Christianity and Power Politics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

      Olson, William (1972) ‘The Growth of a Discipline’, in Brian Porter (ed.), The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-29.

      Olson, William and Groom, A.J.R. (1991) International Relations Then and Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation. London: HarperCollins.

      Olson, William C. and Onuf, Nicholas (1985) ‘The Growth of a Discipline Reviewed’, in Steve Smith (ed.), International Relations: British and American Perspectives. New York: Blackwell. pp 1-28.

      Osiander, Andreas (1998) ’Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, 42 (3): 409-32.

      Palmer, Norman D. (1980) ‘The Study of International Relations in the United States’, International Studies Quarterly, 24 (3): 343-64.

      Peterson, V. Spike (1992) ‘Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21 (2): 183-206.

      Plating, E. Raymond (1969) ‘International Relations as a Field of Inquiry’, in James N. Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. New York: The Free Press. pp. 6-19.

      Porter, Brian (ed.) (1972) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press.

      Potter, Pitman B. (1923) ‘Political Science in the International Field’, American Political Science Review, 27(3): 381-91.

      Potter, Pitman B. (1925) An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. New York: Century.

      Reinsch, Paul S. (1900) World Politics at the End of the Nineteenth Century, As Influenced by the Oriental Situation. New York: Macmillan.

      Reinsch, Paul S. (1911) Public International Unions Their Work and Organization. Boston: Ginn and Co.

      Reynolds, Charles (1973) Theory and Explanation in International Relations. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

      Rogowski, Ronald (1968) ‘International Politics: The Past as Science’, International Studies Quarterly, 12 (4): 394-418.

      Rosecrance, Richard and Stein, Arthur A. (1973) ‘Interdependence: Myth or Reality?’, World Politics, 26 (I): 1-27.

      Rosenau, James N. (ed.) (1969) International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. New York: The Free Press.

      Rosenau, Pauline (1990) ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19 (I): 83-110.

      Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ruggie, John G. (1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Organization. London: Routledge.

      Schelling, Thomas C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

      Schmidt, Brian C. (1994) ‘The Historiography of Academic International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 20 (4): 349-67.

      Schmidt, Brian C. (1998a) ‘Lessons from the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary History of International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 42 (3): 433-59.

      Schmidt, Brian C, (1998b) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.

      Schmidt, Brian C. (2000) ‘Resurrecting International Political Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29 (I): 153-63.

      Schuman, Frederick L. (1933) International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill.

      Schwarzenberger, Georg (1941) Power Politics: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations and Post-War Planning. London: Jonathan Cape.

      Schweller, Randall L. (1996) ’Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?’, Security Studies, 5 (3): 90-121.

      Simpson, Christopher (ed.) (1998) Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War. New York: New Press.

      Singer, J. David (1969) ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’, in James N. Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. New York: The Free Press. pp.20-9.

      Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin (1972) The Wages of War, 1816-1965: A Statistical Handbook. New York: John Wiley.

      Smith, Michael Joseph (1986) Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

      Smith, Steve (1985) International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.

      Smith, Steve (1987) ‘Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16 (2): 189-206.

      Smith, Steve (1992) ‘The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21 (3): 489-506.

      Smith, Steve (1995) ‘The Self-images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory’, in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds), International Relations Theory Today. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 1-37.

      Smith, Steve (2000) ‘The Discipline of International Relations: Still An American Social Science’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2 (3): 374-402.

      Snyder,

Скачать книгу